Search Results for "registration rules"

4116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of BSMD Graduates Against MCI for Provisional Registration - Medical Council of India Cannot Refuse Registration Solely on Ground of Non-Recognition of Foreign Medical Course Under Section 25(1) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.

The petitioners, Shivaji Dnyandeo Patil and another, completed their HSC in February 2003 and secured admission in October 2003 to a Bachelor of Scien...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Election Petition Filed Online Within Limitation Despite Procedural Deficiency. Procedural deficiency in online filing within limitation period does not render petition time-barred under Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Election Rules, 1966.

The case involves two writ petitions challenging the dismissal of election petitions as time-barred by the District Judge, Raigad. The election result...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Non-Renewal of Courier License Without Hearing - Violation of Natural Justice. Refusal to renew authorized courier registration without opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Aramex India Private Limited, is engaged in international carriage of time-sensitive documents and parcels. It was registered as an au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Petitioner's Trade Mark for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement Under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Removal of Trade Mark 'CIPLA' Held Void as Registrar Failed to Send O-3 Notice to Registered Proprietor, Contravening Statutory Mandate.

The petitioner, Cipla Limited, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the removal of its registered trade mark 'CIPLA' from the register and a mandamus ...