Bombay High Court Allows Registration of Cooperative Societies Despite Overlap with Existing Societies, Quashes Registrar's Refusal Based on Government Policy. Section 4 of MCS Act, 1960 does not prohibit registration merely due to overlapping area of operation; policy circulars cannot override statutory provisions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Pandurang Vividh Karyakakri Sahakari Seva Sanstha Ltd. and Nagnath Vividh Karyakakri Sahakari Seva Sanstha Ltd., filed writ petitions challenging the orders of the Assistant Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar refusing registration of their proposed cooperative societies. The sole ground for refusal was that the proposed area of operation overlapped with the area of existing societies, relying on Government policy circulars. The court examined Section 4 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which allows registration of societies for promotion of economic interests or general welfare, with a proviso that no society shall be registered if it is likely to be economically unsound. The court also considered Rule 6 of the MCS Rules, 1961, which requires the Registrar to consider whether the proposed society is likely to be economically sound and whether its registration will be in the interest of cooperative movement. The court held that the policy circulars relied upon by the authorities were not issued under any statutory power and cannot override the statutory provisions. The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the Assistant Registrar to consider the applications afresh without reference to the policy circulars, in accordance with Section 4 and Rule 6.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Registration - Overlap of Area - Section 4 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The court held that Section 4 does not prohibit registration of a society merely because its proposed area of operation overlaps with an existing society. The proviso to Section 4 only requires that the society is not likely to be economically unsound. Government policy circulars cannot override the statutory provisions. The impugned orders were quashed and the Assistant Registrar was directed to consider the applications afresh without reference to the policy circulars. (Paras 4-10)

B) Cooperative Societies - Government Policy - Validity - Section 4 of MCS Act, 1960 and Rule 6 of MCS Rules, 1961 - The court observed that the policy circulars relied upon by the authorities were not issued under any statutory power and cannot be used to refuse registration. The Registrar must apply his mind independently to the requirements of Section 4 and Rule 6. (Paras 7-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Assistant Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar were justified in refusing registration of the proposed cooperative societies solely on the ground that their proposed area of operation overlaps with the area of operation of existing societies, relying on Government policy circulars.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the impugned orders of the Assistant Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar, and directed the Assistant Registrar to consider the applications for registration afresh without reference to the policy circulars, in accordance with Section 4 of the MCS Act, 1960 and Rule 6 of the MCS Rules, 1961.

Law Points

  • Registration of cooperative societies
  • Overlap of area of operation
  • Government policy vs statutory provisions
  • Section 4 MCS Act 1960
  • Rule 6 MCS Rules 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (01) 70

Writ Petition No. 2808 of 2011 and Writ Petition No. 2809 of 2011

2012-01-18

G. S. Godbole

Mr. Amit Borkar for Petitioner, Mr. P.S. Dani with Mr. Chetan G. Patil for Respondent No.1, Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, Addl. GP for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4

Pandurang Vividh Karyakakri Sahakari Seva Sanstha Ltd. and Nagnath Vividh Karyakakri Sahakari Seva Sanstha Ltd.

Proposed Shri Chh. Shivaji Maharaj Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Seva Society Ltd. and others; Proposed Shri Anand Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Seva Society Ltd. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging refusal of registration of proposed cooperative societies.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of orders of Assistant Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar refusing registration, and direction to consider applications afresh.

Filing Reason

The Assistant Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar refused registration solely on the ground that the proposed area of operation overlaps with existing societies, relying on Government policy circulars.

Previous Decisions

The Assistant Registrar refused registration; the appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was dismissed.

Issues

Whether the refusal of registration based on overlap of area of operation is valid under Section 4 of MCS Act, 1960. Whether Government policy circulars can override statutory provisions for registration of cooperative societies.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Section 4 does not prohibit registration merely because of overlap; the proviso only requires economic soundness. Respondent argued that the policy circulars require that no new society should be registered if its area overlaps with an existing society.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 4 of the MCS Act, 1960 does not prohibit registration of a cooperative society merely because its proposed area of operation overlaps with an existing society. The only restriction is that the society should not be likely to be economically unsound. Government policy circulars not issued under statutory power cannot override the statutory provisions.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 4 of the MCS Act, 1960 does not prohibit registration of a society merely because its proposed area of operation overlaps with an existing society. The policy circulars relied upon by the authorities were not issued under any statutory power and cannot override the statutory provisions.

Procedural History

The petitioners applied for registration of their proposed cooperative societies. The Assistant Registrar refused registration. Appeals to the Divisional Joint Registrar were dismissed. The petitioners then filed writ petitions in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 4
  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961: Rule 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Registration of Cooperative Societies Despite Overlap with Existing Societies, Quashes Registrar's Refusal Based on Government Policy. Section 4 of MCS Act, 1960 does not prohibit registration merely due to overlapping area o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by State Financial Corporation Against Injunction Restraining Possession Under Section 29 of SFC Act. Statutory Right to Take Possession Cannot Be Injuncted Without Proof of Arbitrariness.