INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1767 OF 2020
3 Nov 2025...
Search Results for "registration estoppel"
352 result(s) found
Found 352 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.
6 May 2005The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit as Barred by Res Judicata in Trademark Infringement Dispute. Prior Consent Terms and Withdrawal of Earlier Suit Operate as Res Judicata Under Section 11 CPC.
18 Nov 2016The plaintiffs, Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal and others, filed a suit alleging infringement of their registered trademark 'MANIKCHAND' and passing off...
- 138
High Court
High Court Quashes Commissioner's Rejection of Charitable Trusts' Registration Renewal Under Income-tax Act - Mandatory Irrevocability Clause Not Statutorily Required. Commissioner's Action Imposing Extra-Statutory Condition and Arbitrary Online Form Compulsion Held Unsustainable Under Sections 12AA and 12AB of Income-tax Act, 1961.
9 Mar 2026The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition filed by several charitable trusts and professional bodies challenging the rejection of t...
- 603
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'STREAX' Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'STREAK Street' Used for Hair Products. The court found the defendants' adoption dishonest and the marks phonetically similar, warranting restraint pending trial.
5 Mar 2025The plaintiff, Hygienic Research Institute Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Chandan an...
- 675
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Injunction in Pharmaceutical Trademark Dispute Due to Delay and Acquiescence. Similarity of marks alone insufficient for interim relief when defendant has used its registered mark for nearly a decade without evidence of confusion.
15 Mar 2017The plaintiff, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Wockhardt Ltd and Overseas African Remedie...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit as Attesting Witnesses Deny Testator's Presence During Execution. Will Not Proved in Solemn Form Due to Non-Compliance with Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925.
10 Feb 2017The dispute concerned the estate of Sahadev Deraj Shah, who died on 5th January 1998. His second wife, Shobhana, and the executors propounded a Will d...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Injunction Set Aside Due to Vague Pleadings and Lack of Prima Facie Case. The court held that without proper proof of trademark ownership and clear pleadings, an interim injunction cannot be granted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
21 Sep 2013The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction granted by the Principal District Judge, Pune, restraining the appellants from using the tra...
- 204
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — 'HAYWARDS 5000' v. 'COX 5001'. The court held that the Defendant's mark 'COX 5001' is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks 'HAYWARDS 5000' and 'FIVE THOUSAND', constituting infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and passing off under Section 135.
8 Dec 2025The Plaintiff, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd., filed a commercial suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, Jagpin Brewerise Lim...
- 218
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
10 Sep 2014The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...
- 120
