Search Results for "reassessment"

859 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 859 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Reasons. Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside as Assessing Officer Failed to Record and Disclose Reasons for Reopening Assessment Completed Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Tanna Builders Pvt. Ltd., filed its return for assessment year 1985-86 on 28th June 1985. The Assessing Officer completed the assessme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid When Income Was Already Subject of Block Assessment and Regular Assessment.

The petitioners, Audhut Timblo and Anju Timblo, challenged a notice dated 18.10.2006 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the asse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment — Section 148 Notice Based on Change of Opinion Invalid. Reopening Beyond Four Years Requires Failure to Disclose Material Facts, Which Was Not Established.

The petitioner, Fiat India Automobiles Limited, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2012 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal Against ITAT Order for Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Decide Legal Issue. Tribunal's Remand of Deduction Dispute Under Section 33AC of Income Tax Act Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Rule 27 of ITAT Rules.

The appellant, New Era Shipping Ltd., challenged an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 19.07.2011. The ITAT had set aside the Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — Change of Opinion Not Permissible Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Set Aside as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Was Alleged.

The petitioner, Shriram Foundry Ltd., challenged a notice dated 10 February 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reassessment Cannot Be Based Solely on Subsequent Year's Assessment Order Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The Petitioner, Sitara Diamond Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 20 June 2011 issued u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose — Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure

The petitioner, DIL Ltd., challenged a notice dated 8 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Full Disclosure of Waiver of Interest in Original Assessment Precludes Reassessment After Four Years.

The Petitioner, Lok Housing and Construction Limited, challenged a notice dated 29 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, se...