WRIT PETITION NO. 12656 OF 2023
8 Apr 2025The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against the order dated 31 July ...
Search Results for "proposal and acceptance"
627 result(s) found
Found 627 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights
8 Nov 2024The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...
- 2097
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses IPS Officer's Challenge to Rejection of Voluntary Retirement. Central Government's Decision to Reject Voluntary Retirement Upheld as Disciplinary Proceedings Were Contemplated and Petitioner Was Not Clear from Vigilance Angle.
15 May 2024The petitioner, a 1997 batch IPS officer of Maharashtra Cadre, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 7th ...
- 413
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Insurance Ombudsman Award in Health Insurance Claim Dispute — Repudiation of Claim for Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Disease Set Aside. Insurer Failed to Prove That Insured Had Knowledge of Pre-Existing Condition at Time of Policy Inception Under Section 45 of Insurance Act, 1938.
21 Oct 2022The petitioners, Mrs. Jaya Elizabeth Mathew and Mr. Preneesh Oommen, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India cha...
- 202
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.
25 Jul 2022This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS). Resignation Submitted Under MVRS Was Unconditional and Could Not Be Withdrawn After Acceptance, as Per Scheme Terms Under Clause 5.1.
27 Sep 2021The dispute arose from the respondent's resignation under the Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS) introduced by the appellants, a public secto...
- 196
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Ruling in Concession Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Binding on Consortium Members as They Were Not Signatories to the Concession Agreement.
1 Mar 2018The petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, a major port constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, issued a glo...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Makes Conditional Winding Up Order in Contract Dispute Over Endorsements. Interpretation of contract endorsements determines existence of debt under Companies Act, 1956.
7 Feb 2014The petitioner, Reliance Broadcast Network Limited, filed a winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, Raj Oil Mills Lt...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Resignation by Air India. Resignation by employee was not voluntary but under duress due to trade union pressure, and employer failed to follow proper procedure under service rules.
8 Jul 2013The petitioner, Rakesh Rai, was an employee of M/s National Aviation Company of India (Air India), a government company and 'State' under Article 12 o...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit by Cotton Corporation Against Textile Mill for Unpaid Price of Imported Cotton. Court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal sum with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of suit till payment.
8 Aug 2005The plaintiff, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, a government undertaking and canalising agency for import of cotton, filed a suit for recovery of ...
- 109
