Search Results for "promotion deferred"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Assured Career Progression Scheme Benefits to Forest Guard — Petitioner Entitled to ACPS from Date of Completion of 16 Years of Service as per Government Memorandum dated 22/2/2001. Denial of ACPS on ground of prior promotions held arbitrary and discriminatory.

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath B. Desai, a Forest Guard employed by the State of Goa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to Assessment Order Restricting Sales Tax Incentives under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993. Expansion Unit Seeks Quashing of Order Alleging It Is Without Jurisdiction and Contrary to Scheme Terms.

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of automobiles and spare parts, filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SEIAA's Deferral of Environmental Clearance Based on NGT Judgment. SEIAA Must Independently Apply Mind to Each Proposal and Cannot Mechanically Defer Decisions Due to NGT's Order on Recreational Ground.

The Petitioner No.1, NAREDCO West Foundation, is the Maharashtra chapter of the National Real Estate Development Council, representing over 400 real e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Union of India's Challenge to CAT Order Allowing Promotion to IAS Officer Despite Screening Committee's Assessment. Union of India Contends That Promotion Was Denied Due to Unsatisfactory Service, Not Merely Quashing of Charges.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the Union of India against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, dated 31 March...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA in Favor of Housing Societies. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA even if the developer retains development rights over part of the land.

The Petitioner-Developer, Kiran Builders Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15 May 2017 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Kotwals' Writ Petition Against Age Bar; Applies COVID-19 Relaxation GR to Group D Absorption. The Court Found That Government Resolution Dated 17.12.2021 Should Be Interpreted Liberally to Include All Kotwals Affected by Recruitment Delays, Ensuring No Anomalous Exclusion.

The petitioners, eleven Kotwals working on honorarium in Aurangabad district, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order ...