Search Results for "previous employer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "previous employer"

689 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 689 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

7 Jul 2026

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Workman Status in Industrial Dispute. Tribunal's finding that employee was a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as not perverse.

5 Jul 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Procter and Gamble Health Limited (formerly Merck Ltd.), challenged an award dated 28.02.2020 passed by the Industrial Tribunal a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case Due to Lack of Pleadings and Evidence of Accidental Injury. Death of cable man from heart attack not compensable under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 as no causal connection with employment established.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the employer, Western Coal Fields Limited, against an order of the Commissioner under the Employee's Compensation Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal.

10 Oct 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CGIT Award Holding Canteen Contract as Sham and Bogus, Directs Absorption of Canteen Workers as Direct Employees of Principal Employer. Contract Labour Arrangement Found to Be a Mere Facade with Principal Employer Exercising Complete Control Over Workers, Making Them Direct Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

26 Jul 2016

The petitioner, The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., a public company, challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1 (CGIT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

6 May 2016

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Permanency and Back Wages in Newspaper Industry Dispute. Industrial Court's finding that previous litigation had determined entitlement to permanency and back wages was upheld, but the High Court held that the Industrial Court had no jurisdiction to grant permanency under the MRTU Act.

12 Mar 2010

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees (Sanjay Shalikram Ingle and others) against M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Ltd., chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Damages Levy Case Under Section 14B of EPF Act — Delay in Payment of Provident Fund Dues Attracts Damages Irrespective of Financial Difficulties. Financial Hardship Not a Valid Defence for Delayed Provident Fund Contributions Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

22 Jun 2005

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) appealed against a Single Judge order that set aside notices/orders dated 17.7.1990 and 24.6.1992 levy...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPF Withdrawal Claims by Retired Employees Despite Delay — Limitation Not Applicable to Claims Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court held that the right to withdraw provident fund is a continuing right and cannot be defeated by the employer's failure to deposit contributions or by delay in filing claims.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired employees, Durgasri Srinivas Kallakuri and Amit Gunvantrai Mehta, against the Employees' Pro...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)