Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"

820 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 820 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the trial and appellate courts that the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

5 Dec 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Pradhan Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the respondents, M/s. Virgin Apparels and its p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

18 Nov 2022

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petitions in Cheque Dishonour Cases — Reiterates That Rebuttable Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Stands Until Accused Proves Otherwise. The court held that at the quashing stage, the accused cannot rely on defence evidence to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the complaints must proceed to trial.

25 Mar 2013

The applicant, Subhash Birdichand Patni, filed two criminal applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in Dishonour of Cheque Cases — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld Due to Lack of Evidence on Loan Repayment. The court held that concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with in revision unless perverse, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

30 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Sri Narayana Mudaliyar @ Narayana Raju, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, in two separate cases...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

1 Mar 2021

The appellant, M. Nagappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acq...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt.

31 Mar 2021

The petitioner, T.C. Chandraiah, was the accused in Criminal Case No.433/2013 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna, for an offence unde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Conviction for Dishonour of Cheque When Debt is Less Than Cheque Amount. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies to the existence of a legally enforceable debt, and the accused must rebut it; mere discrepancy in amount does not vitiate the complaint if the debt is proved.

3 Feb 2021

The appellant, M. Ramesh Kumar, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Riyaz Ur Rehaman, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Court holds that presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of complainant once issuance and signature of cheque are admitted, and accused failed to rebut the presumption.

29 Jan 2013

The appellant, Ranjit Singh Sethi, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Abdul Jalil Sha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts not interfered with as accused's mere denial of debt insufficient to rebut statutory presumption.

29 Oct 2021

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Sri N. Jagadeesh, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Security for Loan — Blank Cheque Given as Security Does Not Absolve Liability if Debt Exists

4 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Chandrakant Laxman Kerkar, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque for Rs. 6...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)