Search Results for "pre-trap panchanama"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashwin Chintaman Shambharkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 18 of 1997 for offences under Section 7 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shriram s/o Timaji Chachane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia in Special Case No. 3/93 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Defective Sanction and Probable Defence. Demand for Amount Held to Be Visit Fees and Medicine Expenses, Not Illegal Gratification, Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

This criminal appeal arises from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a veterinary doctor employed at Panchayat S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal by Accused Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Challenge Hinges on Proof of Demand and Credibility of Complainant.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shrikrushna s/o Janardhan Chaudhari, was a Police Constable attached to Akot Police Station. On 15.1.1993, he along with other constabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Prevention of Corruption Case Due to Hostile Complainant and Plausible Defence. Foundational Facts of Demand and Acceptance Not Established as Complainant Admitted Receiving Full Entitlement and That Disputed Amount Was His Own Contribution.

This criminal appeal was filed by the State of Maharashtra through the Anti-Corruption Bureau against the acquittal of Anandrao Rajaram Patil, a Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sewakdas Tukaram Jumde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948 Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23.7.1990 passed by the Special Judge, Thane, in Special Case No. 9 of 1985, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Haridas Jamunah, a Police Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Court, Washim for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.1000 for...