Search Results for "pre-meditation"

453 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 453 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration — Appellant's Acquittal Sought on Grounds of Inconsistent Witness Testimony and Lack of Direct Evidence Dismissed.

The appellant, Ramu @ Ramdas Rupaji Bhavar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Nashik for the murder of his neighbour Shivram Pawar und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Ocular Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Mangesh Sadanand Masane and Sadanand Namdev Masane (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) against their conviction an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging De-empanelment of Advocate by Bank of Baroda Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Issued with Premeditation Violates Right to Fair Hearing Under Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, a registered legal practitioner since 1980 and empanelled with the Bank of Baroda for over 30 years, was de-empanelled by a communicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Mother Over Trivial Dispute — Iron Rod Assault Constitutes Culpable Homicide. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as evidence of eyewitness, medical report, and recovery of weapon proved homicidal death.

The appellant, Naresh Madhu Pawar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his mother, Ekabai, by the Additional Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Sudden Fight Case. The appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC was altered to Section 304 Part II IPC as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation and the appellant did not take undue advantage.

The appellant Nandlal and the deceased Lakhichand were relatives. A dispute over a common wall led to frequent quarrels. On 16.05.2006, an exchange of...