Search Results for "post-trap panchanama"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search Conducted Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate

The appellant, Yashwant Vithal Patil, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act, Greater Bombay, in NDPS Special Case No.121 of 2009 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Wasudeo Gulhane, a Senior Clerk in the Office of Deputy Director of Vocational Education & Training, Amravati, was convicted by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of Chandrabhan Sadavarti, the original appellant, under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Valid Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants Must Show Application of Mind, Absence Renders Trial Void.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging the acquittal of three respondents, Sanjivkumar Bapurao Wadik...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Medical Officer in Bribery Case. Acceptance of Rs. 100/- from Complainant Held to be Payment of Outstanding Private Clinic Fees, Not Illegal Gratification Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case arose from the conviction of a medical officer under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, Dr. Kiran Anant Deshpande, was a ...