Search Results for "petroleum retail outlet"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes First Appeal No. 10836 of 2023 Against Decree in Special Civil Suit No. 181 of 2017. Judgment Reserved on 6 February 2025 and Pronounced on 23 April 2025.

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), a Government of India undertaking, filed a first appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal, Directs Removal of Fixtures and Equipment from Retail Outlet After Termination of Dealership Contract. Dealer's Right to Not Run Trade Upheld, Liberty to Claim Damages as per Agreement Given to Oil Company.

The dispute arose from the termination of a petroleum dealership contract between Indian Oil Corporation Limited and M/s A.R.Agencies, a dealer runnin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Oil Corporation in Contract Termination Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Direction to Handover Vacant Possession. Corporation Directed to Remove Fixtures and Equipments Within Two Weeks; Liberty Given to Invoke Contract Clauses for Damages.

The dispute arose from a dealership agreement between Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) and M/s A.R.Agencies, a petroleum dealer. IOCL, as the oil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Suspension of IOCL's Petroleum License Due to Lease Expiry. License Cancellation Not Warranted as Civil Suit for Eviction is Pending and No Immediate Danger to Public Safety Established.

The petitioner, Vijay Harinarayan Choudhary, is the owner of a plot in Nagpur which was leased to respondent No.1, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of New Retail Outlets by Oil Corporations Near Petitioner's Existing Petrol Pump. No Legal Right to Monopoly or Protection from Competition in Petroleum Retail Business.

The petitioner, Digambar Mawal Patil, is a dealer of Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) running a petrol pump at Jalna Road, Sultanpur, District Bu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Ineligibility for RO Dealership Due to Procedural Irregularities. Caste Certificate Validity and Stamp Paper Technicality Not Grounds for Rejection.

The petitioner, Mohan Shivaji Tonde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a communication dated 21-01-2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Closure Order Against LPG Dispensing Station for Violation of Natural Justice. License Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing, Violating Principles of Audi Alteram Partem Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sipani Energy Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, engaged in the business of manufacturing, stocking, and distribution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retail Outlet Distance on Highway — Minimum Distance of 300 Meters Upheld. Court holds that the applicable guideline requires a minimum distance of 300 meters between retail outlets on the same highway, not 1000 meters as claimed by petitioner.

The petitioner, Ujwala w/o Santosh Kendre, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the grant of a retail outlet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Selection for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Cancellation of Selection Without Show Cause Notice Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration After Hearing.

The petitioner, Mrs. Seema Raju Pol, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the cancellation of her selecti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Dealer in Termination Dispute. No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), a government oil company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...