Search Results for "pension withholding"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalid Order and Directs Restoration of Pension in Halba Tribe Claim Case. Petitioner's Caste Certificate Invalidated Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Vinayak Marotrao Mahajan, a retired Deputy Engineer from Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged the order dated 29.12.2017 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order — No Entitlement to Difference in Pension Without Proper Claim. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to differential pension under Karnataka Municipal Administration Service Rules.

The petitioner, Sadashivappa, a retired civil servant from the Karnataka Municipal Administration Service, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order on Pensionary Benefits. Petitioner's claim for difference in pension based on notional promotion rejected as no right to promotion exists and claim is stale.

The petitioner, a retired civil servant, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 06....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Interpretation of Increment Withholding Order as Major Penalty. Withholding of increment without cumulative effect is a minor penalty, not a major penalty.

The petitioners, Dr. Nilkanth Dhyanoba Jogdande and Dr. Eknath Rambhau Patil, retired employees of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension and Retiral Benefits to Municipal Employee Based on Standing Committee Resolution. The court directed the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation to pay full pension and retiral benefits as per Standing Committee Resolution No. 106/09 dated 18th August 2009.

The petitioner, Dattatray S/o Anandgir Giri, was employed as a Ward Officer with the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. He was suspended on 7th August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Punishment of Withholding Increments Without Departmental Enquiry. Punishment of permanently withholding two increments is a major penalty requiring a formal departmental enquiry under service rules.

The petitioner, Narendra s/o Motiram Bodkhe, a government servant, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Service Matter Challenging Withholding of Increments Without Enquiry. Major Penalty of Permanently Withholding Increments Requires Departmental Enquiry Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Narendra Motiram Bodkhe, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Wardha, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Offi...