Search Results for "pension adjustment"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Combined Pension Calculation Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Legal Heirs of Retired Teacher Granted Relief for Service in Zilla Parishad and Grant-in-Aid School

The High Court allowed a writ petition filed by legal heirs of a retired teacher seeking combined counting of his service in Zilla Parishad school and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to University Employee with 33 Years of Service Despite Temporary Appointments and Breaks. Continuous Service Under Rule 33 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Includes Temporary Service Followed by Confirmation.

The petitioner, a chemistry teacher, served Savitribai Phule Pune University from 1993 until her retirement on 30 April 2016, completing over 33 years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Retirement Benefits Withheld Due to Caste Certificate Dispute — DOPT Circular Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively Without Following Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dilip Chintaman Nandankar, was a Development Officer appointed on 20.05.1987 in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category in the New India Ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...