Search Results for "packing materials"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was found untrustworthy and the recovery of weapon was not sufficiently corroborated.

The appellant, Hira Lohar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Bishnath Mehar. The prosecution case relied heavily on the sole testi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Trade Tax Exemption Case Under U.P. Trade Tax Act. Exemption Denied as New Product Not Considered Different in Nature Under Diversification Scheme Under Section 4-A(5) of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from an appeal by a manufacturer against the denial of trade tax exemption under Section 4-A(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Gutkha Excise Duty Case for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. The court held that the CESTAT's findings on valuation and penalty were factual and not perverse, and no question of law arose under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves appeals filed by M/s. Trishul Arecanut Granuels Private Limited and its Director, H.S. Nataraj, against the Commissioner of Central ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Asian Paints VAT Case — Input Tax Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Despite Non-Use in Manufacturing. Section 11(4) of KVAT Act, 2003 does not restrict ITC on capital goods used for generation of electricity for own consumption.

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) read with Section 9...