RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "order beyond notice"
9503 result(s) found
Found 9503 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.
13 Feb 2019The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
19 Sep 2025The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...
- 28
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Executing Court’s Dismissal of Obstruction Applications Filed Under Order 21 Rule 97 and 99 CPC. Decree for Eviction Executed; Objectors Failed to Prove Possession at Time of Delivery.
5 Dec 2013The revision petitions arose from the execution of eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court in three eviction petitions filed by the decree h...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Oct 2012The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...
- 204
High Court
High Court Disposes Petitions Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Loan Default Cases — Financiers Sought Receiver and Injunction Against Borrower Company and Its Guarantor. Prima Facie Satisfaction of Outstanding Amounts Recorded and Interim Directions Including Status Quo Ordered Against Borrowers to Secure Claims of Rs.100 Crore and Rs.25 Crore.
21 Feb 2013Two arbitration petitions were filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Tata Capital Financial Services Limited and L&T ...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Characterizing Order Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act as Administrative; Petition to be Heard by Division Bench. The Division Bench Rules That Externment Appeal Order Does Not Involve Quasi-Judicial Determination and Thus Falls Outside 'Order' Under Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.
15 Sep 2016The case arose from a Criminal Writ Petition filed by the petitioner challenging an externment order and the subsequent appellate order confirming the...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Orders Directing Issuance of TDR for Land Acquired for Road Widening — Compliance Found, Delay Apologized. The Court held that the respondents had substantially complied with the orders and the delay was not intentional, accepting unconditional apology.
13 Dec 2024The judgment concerns multiple contempt petitions filed by landowners whose land was acquired for widening of Bellary and Jayamahal Roads in Bengaluru...
- 408
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Application Seeking to Treat Oral Dictation as Final Order — Signed Order Prevails Over Dictation in Open Court. The Court held that the signed order uploaded on 12.02.2026 is the binding order, not the oral dictation, and the Judge has the right to change the order until it is signed under Order XII of the Supreme Court Rules.
12 May 2026The Supreme Court dismissed a miscellaneous application filed by respondents in a disposed civil appeal, seeking clarification that the order dictated...
- 391
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.
17 Dec 2024The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...
- 471
