Search Results for "non-appearance"

49 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Exparte Decree Case. Court Holds That Liberal Approach Is Required When Delay Is Not Due to Wilful Neglect and Sufficient Cause Is Shown.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Pushkaraj Wagh (appellant/original defendant) against an exparte decree passed in Spl. Civil Suit No. 22/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence of Counsel. Court Relies on Bani Singh Precedent to Dismiss Appeal on Merits After Counsel Fails to Appear Despite Multiple Opportunities.

The appellant, Ramkrishna Ganesh Wagh, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Sessions Court, Akola, in Sessions Trial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Continuation of Employment Under Section 47 of Persons with Disabilities Act for Bedridden Employee. Employee Suffering Complete Paralysis and Unable to Comprehend Cannot Be Considered 'Disabled' Under the Act for Purpose of Retaining Employment.

The petitioner, Amrut Yeshwant Mate, was an employee of Zilla Parishad, Bhandara. He suffered paralysis and became completely bedridden, unable to und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...