Search Results for "non obstante"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "non obstante"

1160 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1160 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 21(3) MCOCA and Approval for Applying MCOCA Provisions in Organised Crime Case. Challenge to Section 21(3) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 and approval dated 31-10-2004 under Section 23(1)(a) dismissed as not violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 of Constitution.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioners, Lalit Somdatta Nagpal and Anil Somdatta Nagpal, filed two criminal writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to State Commission's Order Setting Aside Attachment in Consumer Dispute. Earlier writ petition challenging same order dismissed for non-prosecution; no fresh cause of action shown.

4 May 2010

The petitioner, R.B. Upadhyay, filed a consumer complaint against Vodafone Essar Ltd. (respondent No.2) for deficiency of service on 20 March 2008, al...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award Directing Satisfaction of Mortgage and Reassignment of Property. The Arbitral Award Had Directed the Mortgagor to Reassign Premises and Pay Outstanding Dues, Which the Legal Heirs of the Deceased Petitioner Contested on Various Grounds Including Improper Impleadment of Legal Representatives.

29 Oct 2010

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an award dated 1st December,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

27 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.

16 Aug 2019

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Suit, Holding Section 134(2) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Confers Additional Forum. Plaintiff Allowed to Sue Where It Carries on Business Even If Cause of Action Arose Elsewhere.

8 Aug 2011

The case arose out of a suit for perpetual injunction filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited (plaintiff) against Ashique Chemicals and others (defendants...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Common Question of Law in Consolidated Commercial Suits and Interim Applications. The Court Interprets Provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in the Context of Multiple Suits Involving Banking, Media, and Other Commercial Disputes.

27 Feb 2019

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Gram Panchayat Adhikari Recruitment Dispute — Waiting List Not Permissible Under 2015 Rules. Division Bench erred in directing consideration of candidates beyond the select list as 2015 Rules override 1978 Rules and do not provide for a waiting list.

12 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court Division Bench. The dispute...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)