Search Results for "motor transport undertaking"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of State Government Undertaking Against Tax Assessment Orders. Exemption Notification Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Held Applicable to Buses Operated on All India Tourist Permits.

The Andhra Pradesh Tourist Development Corporation (APTDC), a State Government undertaking, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notification Exempting Light Motor Vehicles and MSRTC Buses from Toll on Sion-Panvel Highway. Dispute Arises from Concession Agreement Where Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Exemptions Cause Substantial Daily Revenue Loss and Contradicts Terms of Agreement.

The dispute arose from a concession agreement for widening and maintaining an arterial highway from Mumbai to Panvel, awarded to M/s Sion Panvel Tollw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals by Transport Authorities Against State Tourism Corporation's Tax Exemption Claim. Tourist Vehicles of Andhra Pradesh State Tourism Corporation Not Exempt from Tax Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Despite Notification Dated 22.03.1994.

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Assistant Regional Transport Officer and the Deputy Commissioner for Transports against an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation for Pan Shop Owner. Court holds that notional income for self-employed person with no proof of income should be based on minimum wage guidelines, and reduces compensation from Rs. 13,50,073 to Rs. 9,00,000.

The case involves an appeal filed by the Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...