Search Results for "missing suit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "missing suit"

488 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 488 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Builder/Promoter in Summary Suit for Recovery of Maintenance Charges Under MOFA Agreement. Defendant's Failure to File Reply to Summons for Judgment Leads to Decree for Claimed Amount with Interest.

22 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd., a builder/promoter, filed a summary suit against the defendant, M Industries, for recovery of alleged m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Permitting Withdrawal of Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Defect in Map and Incomplete Prayers Constitute Formal Defect.

7 Apr 2017

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the original defendant, Kashinath Badhe, challenging an order of the trial court dated 07/0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was not of essence but plaintiff's conduct showed lack of continuous readiness, disentitling him to discretionary relief under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

12 Feb 2026

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 09.03.2006 for 51 cents of land at Rs.25,000 per cent. He paid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction in Land Allotment Dispute Involving Cooperative Housing Society. Notice of Motion Seeks to Restrain Creation of Third Party Rights Over ~23 Acres Prime Land in Versova, Mumbai.

7 Oct 2014

The judgment text provided only includes the introductory paragraphs outlining the nature of the dispute and the relief sought, without the court's an...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order on Court Fee Valuation in Suit for Declaration and Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that when a plaintiff seeks declaration that a document is forged and not binding, the relief is not capable of valuation and court fee is payable under Section 24(d) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, not under Section 11(2).

29 Apr 2015

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in O.S.No.166/2006 before the II Civil Judge at Mysore, filed a suit for declaration that a palupatti dated 8.7.1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal.

29 Apr 2025

The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

27 Sep 2013

The plaintiff, Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of US$154,000 representing the CIF value of 40 drums of Lincomycin HCL BP ...

High Court

Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.

5 Mar 2026

This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit Against Customs for Wrongful Sale of Goods Held by Court Receiver. Plaintiff entitled to refund of purchase price paid to Court Receiver for goods that could not be delivered due to prior sale by Customs.

28 Sep 2010

The suit was filed by M & H Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) against the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay (Defendant No.1) and the Commissioner of ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)