Search Results for "minor mineral extraction rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "minor mineral extraction rules"

86 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.

10 Apr 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicated a Group of 23 Writ Petitions Against Revenue Authorities. The petitions challenged recovery orders issued by Collectors and Tahsildars, but the substantive judgment content is not present in the extracted text.

2 Aug 2018

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions cha...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.

4 May 2018

The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice for Royalty on Steatite Extraction in Violation of Affidavit Condition — Petitioner's Use of Mineral for Decorative Blocks Not Proved to Be for Cottage Industry. Affidavit Undertaking Not Incorporated in Lease Deed Cannot Be Enforced as Condition of Lease.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioner, S.K. Suresh, held a quarry lease for steatite (a minor mineral) granted on 10-11-2010 under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rul...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Validity of Rule 5 of Goa Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2002 — Declares Quarry Lease Valid Despite Deletion of Chapter III. Rule 5, which deleted Chapter III of the Goa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1985, is held intra vires Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, as the State Government has power to make rules for grant of quarry leases in respect of land belonging to private persons.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Smt. Maria Teresa Philomena D'Rocha Pegado, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the constitutional v...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

2 Aug 2013

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.

8 May 2013

These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sand Extraction Permits Granted Without Public Auction in Violation of Rule 39A of Bombay Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 1955. Permits for Four Blocks in Dabhol Creek/Vashishtha River Set Aside Due to Failure to Follow Mandatory Auction Process Causing Loss to Public Exchequer.

19 May 2010

The petitioners, M/s. S.R. Shipping Co., a proprietary concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the d...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)