Search Results for "mesne profits"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

HPCL’s Eviction and Mesne Profit Dispute Upheld by High Court . Lease Expiry and Valid Termination Confirmed; Civil Revision Applications Dismissed, Mesne Profits Set at Rs. 93,227 Per Month

These Civil Revision Applications are filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), challenging the eviction order and mesne profit determi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Application for Decree on Admission in Property Dispute. Lack of clear and unequivocal admissions by Defendants leads to rejection; Trial Court directed to expedite proceedings within one year.

The Plaintiff sought a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), based on alleged admissions by the Defendants reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Orders Tenant at Sufferance to Pay Mesne Profits and Deposit Significant Sum. Tenant must compensate for continued possession post-lease expiry and comply with court directives pending final judgment.

The court judgment addresses the issue of mesne profits owed by a tenant at sufferance who continued to occupy the property after the lease expired du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Restitution in Court Auction Sales: Upholding Justice Amidst Procedural Challenges Interpretation and Application of Section 144 CPC

Restitution of Judgment Debtors in Court Auction Sales: Interpretation and Application of Section 144 CPC The legal issue in this appeal revolves aro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Partition of Family Properties and Validates Sale Deed. The Supreme Court overturns the High Court's decision on the partition of properties, reinforcing the validity of a sale deed executed by the appellant.

The Supreme Court addressed the partition of family properties, focusing on Regular Survey Nos. 106/2 and 44/4. The High Court had erroneously relied ...