Search Results for "medical bill"

545 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Amputation of Both Legs in Motor Accident Claim. Claimant, a medical practitioner, awarded Rs. 25,00,000/- for permanent disability and loss of earning capacity under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dr. Prashant Pundlikrao Munde, a medical practitioner, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Jeevan Aadhar Policy Condition That Annuity Payable Only After Death of Proposer Under Section 80DD Income Tax Act. Court Holds That Policy Terms Align with Statutory Scheme and No Violation of Article 14.

The petitioner, Ravi Agrawal, a differently abled person, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability of Barber Assessed at 100% Due to Leg Injury. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.2,38,100 to Rs.9,96,000 Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sunil @ Bapu Damodar Jagtap, a barber aged 49 years, sustained a permanent disability due to a leg injury in a motor vehicle accident. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Insured's Appeal in Motor Insurance Claim Case — Policy Extended to Nepal Covers Accident Occurring Therein. Insurer Liable to Indemnify Third-Party Claims Under Motor Vehicle Insurance Policy Despite Territorial Extension Clause.

The appellant, Hem Raj, owned a Mahindra Pick-up vehicle insured with The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. under policy No.36060231130100003910 for the pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Businessman with 50% Disability. Compensation enhanced from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 9,27,000 by applying correct multiplier of 18, adding future prospects, and not deducting personal expenses.

The appellant, Ramchand Kishnani, a businessman aged 42, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensatio...