Search Results for "masonry work"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Frames Points for Consideration in Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Recovery Suit in Construction Contract Dispute. Plaintiffs Claimed Excess Payment and Defective Work; Court's Final Order Not Available in Provided Text.

Background: The dispute concerned a construction contract for a residential house in Bangalore. The plaintiffs (appellants) were the owners who had en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Slum Land Acquisition and Letter of Intent. Court Holds Petitioner's Ownership Interest Sufficient for Locus Standi but Upholds State Action Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The case involved two writ petitions filed in 1999 and 2000 under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a land acquisition notification dated 6-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Kadamba Transport Corporation in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Amputation of Thumb. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per Month Instead of Rs. 5,000, Multiplier Reduced from 16 to 11 Based on Age.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Santosh Anant Naik (respondent no.1/claimant) against Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd. (appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Holding Suit Maintainable Despite MRTP Act Bar. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Section 149 of MRTP Act Where Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Just Planning Violations.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 22/3/2013 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals, Remands Case for Fresh Assessment, Clarifies Taxability of Unauthorised Structures and Reassessment of Land. Unauthorised Structures Held Liable to Property Tax Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, While Land Already Assessed Cannot Be Reassessed.

The four first appeals before the Bombay High Court arose out of orders passed by the Small Causes Court in municipal appeals concerning the fixation ...