Search Results for "market yard"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at ₹90 per Square Metre. Comparable Sale Deed with Escalation and Deduction for Development Charges Applied Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case arises from an appeal by the original applicants (legal heirs of Pandu Y. Kubal) seeking enhancement of compensation for land acquired by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Market Committee and Licensee in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Licensee Estopped from Denying Licensor's Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act, 1872; Market Committee Not Necessary Party in Co-owner Dispute.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a shop in a market yard. The plaintiffs, Mohammad Hanif Abdul Wahid Shaikh and Mohammad Asif Mohammad H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Agricultural Societies Challenging Licence Cancellation Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Societies Failed to Establish Market Yard Despite Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioners, fourteen agricultural produce societies, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of their licences under the Maharashtra A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Agricultural Marketing Board Rules for Preferential Allotment to Displaced Dealers. Conditions of Three Years Licensing and Minimum Turnover of Rs.5 Lakhs Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14.

The case involves appeals against judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning the validity and interpretation of the Punjab State Agricu...