Search Results for "lunatic"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Sub-Registrar's Refusal to Delete Agreement of Sale Entry from Encumbrance Certificate. Sub-Registrar Has No Power to Make Entries of Unregistered Agreements of Sale Under Registration Act, 1908, and Cannot Refuse Deletion.

The petitioner, Ramesh Timmanna Umarani, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Wife's Appeal in Divorce Case Due to Lack of Proof of Cruelty. Allegations of Mental Cruelty Under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Not Substantiated; Family Court's Dismissal of Divorce Petition Upheld.

The appellant-wife filed an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the judgment dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Princip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in POCSO and Rape Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused for Offences Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act Upheld Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the acquittal of Mathru Sateri Gurav (respondent/accused) by the III Additional District and Sessions Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Sub-Registrar in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Petitioner's Role as Registering Authority Not Sufficient to Attract Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 IPC Without Evidence of Intent or Knowledge.

The petitioner, Bhuvaneshwar S/o Laxman Masamatti, was working as a Sub-Registrar at Jamakhandi. He was arrayed as accused No.6 in Crime No.24/2020 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Wife's Appeal Declaring Marriage Void Under Section 11 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Inter-Faith Marriage Not Solemnized as per Hindu Rites. Marriage between a Christian and a Hindu is void ab initio under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as the Act applies only to Hindus.

The appellant, Rency Mathew, a Christian by faith, married the respondent, Bharath Kumar, a Hindu, on 12.12.2005 according to Hindu customs and rites....