Search Results for "limited review"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "limited review"

3925 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3925 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC fails as petitioner seeks re-argument on merits, not review of error.

16 Dec 2025

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav, delivered a CAV order on 16.12.2025 in Review Petit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Review Case Due to High Court Exceeding Review Jurisdiction. High Court's Review Order Set Aside as It Acted as Appellate Court, Violating Limited Scope Under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

24 Feb 2023

The dispute originated from an order by the Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation dated 17.07.2008 concerning a pathway in Tiruchirappalli. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Public Interest Litigation Regarding Charitable Hospitals — No Error Apparent on Record Found. Review petition dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or any other ground for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The case is a review petition filed by Shri Seva Medical Foundation and its trustees against the judgment in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 3132 of 2004. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Dispute Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as petitioners failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment dated 23.04.2021 in W.A. No. 898/1993.

7 Jan 2025

The case involves a review petition filed by the legal representatives of the original appellant (since deceased) against a judgment dated 23.04.2021 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Applications in Land Acquisition Cases Based on Overruled Precedent. Court held review maintainable under Article 137 of Constitution of India as subsequent Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority overruled earlier Pune Municipal Corporation decision, altering law and providing sufficient reason for review, with matters restored for fresh consideration on merits.

17 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with a group of review applications filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and Delhi Development Authority under Article 137 ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Human Rights Act Case — Non-Consideration of Arguments Not a Ground for Review. Review petitioners sought review of order in W.P.No.11248 of 2021 under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, but court held no error apparent.

24 Jun 2026

The review application was filed by two police officers, M.Venkatesan and Elangovan, seeking review of an order dated 21.11.2025 passed by the Madras ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.

9 Mar 2018

The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Review Petition by Zilla Parishad — Unexplained Delay of 3 Years and 3 Months Not Condonable. Local Self-Government's Clumsy Decision-Making Process Not Sufficient Cause for Inordinate Delay.

20 Nov 2025

The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Education Officer (Primary), and Chief Account Officer of Zilla Parish...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Property Partition Suit — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC dismissed as the court found no error in the judgment dated 7.9.2012 in RSA No.5985/2010 regarding share fixation.

2 Sep 2014

The review petition was filed by the petitioners (legal representatives of the deceased original plaintiff) against the judgment dated 7.9.2012 passed...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)