Search Results for "licensee deemed tenant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "licensee deemed tenant"

179 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 179 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Licensor in Eviction Dispute Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — License Held for Residential Purpose. The court restored the eviction order of the Competent Authority, holding that the license was for residential purpose and the Competent Authority had jurisdiction under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Deepak S. Kavadiya, is the owner of Flat No. A/1102, Juhu Griha Swapna CHSL, JVPD, Juhu, Vile Parle West, Mumbai-400056. Respondent No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

18 Apr 2024

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Unascertained Damages Claim — Lock-in Period License Fee Not a Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for balance license fee after premature vacation is a claim for damages requiring adjudication, not a debt due and payable under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioning-creditor, Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination. Court upholds findings that agreement was a lease under Transfer of Property Act, not a licence, and that tenant sublet premises without consent, violating Bombay Rent Act.

8 Jan 2016

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant in Bonafide Requirement Case — Landlord's Need for Residential Premises Prevails After 40-Year Litigation. The court affirmed concurrent findings of bonafide requirement under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, dismissing the tenant's petition.

22 Jan 2018

The case involves a long-standing eviction dispute between a landlord, M.K. Mahipalsingh, and a tenant, Messrs. Indian Scientific Glass Industries, a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Dispute — Landlord's Bonafide Need Not Established. Tenant's Right to Retention Upheld Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 as Landlord Failed to Prove Genuine Requirement and Tenant Would Suffer Greater Hardship.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between the legal heirs of the original landlord (petitioners) and the tenant (respondent) over eviction from a premises g...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tenant Regularization Case Under U.P. Rent Control Act. First Respondent Deemed Authorized Tenant Under Section 14 of Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 Due to Landlord Consent Inferred from Lack of Objection from 1975 to 1994.

20 Sep 2021

The dispute centered on the ownership and tenancy status of premises in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh. The appellant, Geeta Gupta, claimed ownership through a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Protected Sub-Tenancy Under Bombay Rent Act — Conducting Agreement Does Not Create Sub-Tenancy. The court held that a conducting agreement is a license and does not confer sub-tenancy rights under the Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2005

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed a suit in the Small Causes Court, Bombay seeking a declaration that he was a protected sub-tenant of a shop ...

High Court

"Upholding Eviction: Court Rules in Favor of Landlord Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act" "Conclusive Evidence in Written Agreements Seals Eviction; Jurisdictional and Procedural Claims Dismissed"

24 Jun 2024

The case involves the eviction proceedings under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on Leave and License Agreements between t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Suit in Bona Fide Requirement Dispute. Appellate Court's Reversal Upheld as Landlord Failed to Prove Reasonable and Bona Fide Need for Suit Premises Under Section 13(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar I. Agarwal, through his constituted authority, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)