Search Results for "legal bar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "legal bar"

6664 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6664 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Bar Council of India's Ex-Parte Suspension Order Against Advocate for Violation of Natural Justice. The Court holds that interim suspension from practice is a prejudicial order requiring prior hearing under Section 48A(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

17 Nov 2022

The petitioner, a senior advocate with 28 years of practice and a sitting member of the Karnataka State Bar Council, faced a complaint of professional...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Bar Council Rule Limiting Regular Approval of Law Colleges to Five Years. Rule 2(xxiv) of the Rules of Legal Education 2008 Held Intra Vires the Advocates Act, 1961; Permanent Approval Status Not Recognized Under New Rules.

8 Apr 2020

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar College of Law, challenged the validity of Rule 2(xxiv) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Bar Council Disciplinary Order Against Advocate for Violation of Natural Justice — Order Passed by Unauthorized Committee Member Without Jurisdiction. The court held that a disciplinary committee under Section 36 of the Advocates Act, 1961 must be properly constituted and proceedings must comply with natural justice; a single advocate member cannot pass a binding order.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Geeta Ramanugrah Shastri, an advocate practicing since 1985 and having served as Assistant Government Pleader and Additional Governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enrolment of LCEH Holder as Advocate Despite Bar Council Objection. University Recognition of Qualification as Equivalent to Degree is Binding on Bar Council for Enrolment Under Section 24(1)(c)(iii) of Advocates Act, 1961.

10 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Archana Girish Sabnis, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging a communication from the Bar Council of Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 64 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Barring Legal Practitioners from Appearing Before College Tribunal. Section 64 is Not Repugnant to Advocates Act, 1961 as Section 30 Thereof is Not in Force and Tribunal is Not a Court.

15 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging Section 64 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, which bars legal practitioners from appeari...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partnership Law Case on Maintainability of Suit by Unregistered Firm. The Court held that Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 does not bar a suit for declaration and injunction based on fraud and statutory rights, as it does not involve enforcement of contractual rights.

31 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a suit filed by an unregistered partnership firm, Shiv Developers, seeking declaration and injunction to nullify a sale deed dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitioners in Bar Association Election Dispute, Upholding High Court's Directions for Fresh Polls Due to Misconduct. The Court affirmed the High Court's suo moto cognizance and orders for fresh elections after incidents of unruly behavior and breach of protocol during the Awadh Bar Association election on 14.08.2021, emphasizing the need to maintain decorum and purity in Bar Association elections.

24 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in its appellate jurisdiction, dismissed special leave petitions filed by advocates contesting the election of the Awadh B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Directions Against Lawyers' Strikes in Uttarakhand — Lawyers Have No Right to Strike or Boycott Courts. The Court held that strikes by advocates interfere with administration of justice and access to justice, and that Bar Councils must take disciplinary action against such conduct.

28 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the District Bar Association, Dehradun, challenging a High Court judgment that directed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Direct Designation as Senior Advocate — Power Vests Exclusively in Full Court Under Indira Jaising Guidelines. Petitioner's Claim for Direct Conferment of Senior Advocate Designation Rejected as Not Maintainable.

21 Oct 2024

The petitioner, a lawyer enrolled with the Bar Council of Chhattisgarh since 2013, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Bar Council of Mah...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Direction on Marking Appearances of Advocates in Court Proceedings - CBI Investigation to Remain Independent. The court held that the right to practice under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is not absolute and the direction requiring Advocates-on-Record to mark appearances only of authorized advocates does not infringe any legal rights.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court disposed of miscellaneous applications filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record A...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)