Search Results for "legal advisor"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "legal advisor"

220 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 220 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application to Appoint Arbitrator in BPCL Contract Dispute — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act. The court held that an arbitration clause giving one party the sole right to appoint an arbitrator is invalid under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed an independent arbitrator.

26 May 2017

The applicant, DBM Geotechnics & Constructions Pvt Ltd (DBM), filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition in International Commercial Arbitration with Foreign Seat. Court holds that Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 does not apply where seat of arbitration is outside India, and no interim relief can be granted under Section 9.

6 Nov 2012

The petitioner, BG Strategic Advisors, LLC, a Florida corporation, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Challenge by Additional Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors Against Termination Clause in Fresh Appointment Advertisement. Court Examines Whether Clause 7 of 13.03.2015 Advertisement Amounts to Illegal Termination in Violation of Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984, and Article 14 of Constitution of India.

5 May 2015

The petitioners, functioning as Additional Government Pleaders, Assistant Government Pleaders, and Additional Public Prosecutors in the High Court of ...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Lack of Counterclaim. The award was found patently illegal as it granted compensation to an investor who had not filed any claim or counterclaim, based on a misconception from conciliation proceedings.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a stockbroker's operational error in handling a Margin Trading Facility account for an investor, leading to the auction of shar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Bid in Tender Process for Distribution Franchisee — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action by State Entity. The court quashed the disqualification of the petitioner's bid due to non-submission of power of attorney in prescribed format, holding that the respondent failed to provide prior notice or opportunity to explain.

28 Jul 2010

The petitioner, A2Z Maintenance & Engineering Services Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the disqualification of its bid by the Maharashtra S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Dec 2014

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Steps. Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked where respondent failed to appoint arbitrator within 30 days of notice.

17 Jul 2026

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and the respondent, a multi-state co-operative society constituted under the Mult...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge Due to Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Adverse CR Entries Without Communication Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008.

16 Nov 2011

The petitioner, a judicial officer, challenged an order dated 26 February 2010 passed by the Principal Secretary and Legal Advisor, Law and Justice De...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Corruption Proceedings Against Structural Engineer on High Rise Committee — Not a 'Public Servant' Under Section 2(c)(viii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Appointment as Expert Member on Government Committee Without Salary or Government Service Does Not Attract PC Act Definition.

12 Sep 2014

The applicant, Shailesh Ramanlal Mahimtura, a highly qualified structural engineer with three decades of experience, was appointed as a member of the ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)