Search Results for "lame accused"

95 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(f) and 366A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Thorat, was convicted by the Special Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Challenged Woman Under Section 376(2)(l) IPC. Evidence of Victim's Mental Condition and Consistent Testimony of Witnesses Sufficient to Prove Forcible Sexual Intercourse.

The appellant, Raju Jaishriram Telgote, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot in Sessions Case No. 64/2015 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MCOC Act Kidnapping and Extortion Case — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Under Section 3 of MCOC Act. Single Incident of Kidnapping Does Not Constitute Continuing Unlawful Activity by an Organised Crime Syndicate Under Section 2(1)(d) and (e) of MCOC Act.

The judgment pertains to two bail applications filed by Raju Bhadre and Rahul Dubey, who were arrested in connection with Crime No. 468/2015 registere...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ashok, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Bijapur, for the murder of Rachappa under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 120B r/w 302 IPC. Conviction Stemmed from Alleged Conspiracy to Murder Inder Bhatija by Accused No.1 and Others.

The appeal arose from the conviction and sentence of accused No.1 Pappu @ Suresh Budharmal Kalani by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Balwant Malvankar, was a clerk/beat inspector with the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. He was convicted by the Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against MCOCA Charges in Robbery Case — Appellant Fails to Show Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Organized Crime. Court upholds trial court's rejection of discharge, finding sufficient material to proceed under MCOCA for dacoity and robbery offences.

The appellant, Maruti Navnath Sonawane, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Special Judge for MCOCA at B...