Search Results for "irrationality"

318 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Shiksha Karmis in Bias and Natural Justice Conflict. Breach of Audi Alteram Partem Cured by Revisional Hearing Where No Actual Bias Proved Under Section 40(c) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.

The case involves four civil appeals arising from a split verdict of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of appointments of Shiksha Karmi (Grade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Liability for Pre-Sale Property Tax Arrears After Sale of Property. Transferor Not Liable for Taxes Accruing After Transfer Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Vishal Laxman Sakhare, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Pune, which reversed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reservation Condition in Development Permission Dispute. MHADA Housing Reservation Deleted by Sanctioned Modification to Development Plan, Municipal Corporation Cannot Insist on Compliance.

The petitioner, Cosmos Constructions, a partnership firm, owned land at Chitalsar, Manpada, Thane. The Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) imposed Condi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MUDA Allotment of Civic Amenities Site. Allotment to Second Respondent Upheld as Decision-Making Process Found Free from Illegality, Irrationality, or Procedural Impropriety.

The dispute arose from the allotment of a civic amenity site by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Pursuant to a public notification dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...