Search Results for "invoice month"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "invoice month"

212 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Court Clerk for Criminal Breach of Trust and Forgery of Records. Property Clerk misappropriated muddemal property and amounts, and made false entries in registers, convicted under Sections 409, 466, 477 IPC.

8 Apr 2026

The applicant, Kanhaiyalal Damahe, was a property clerk in the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division, Saoner, from 1.6.2001 to 31.5.2005. During his te...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold and Delivered. Dispute Over Principal Amount and Interest Rate Constitutes Triable Issues Under Order XXXVII CPC.

19 Jan 2024

The Plaintiff, Oriental Aromatics Limited, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the Defendant, Poonam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Supplied — Limitation Period Computed from Date of Default, Not Invoice Date. The court held that the suit for recovery of price of goods was within limitation as the cause of action arose on the date of default, i.e., 30 days after the last invoice, and the suit was filed within three years.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Nova Flexipack (P) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs.21,79,218/- from t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of DEEC Shipping Bill to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 Mandates Prior Denial of DEEC Benefit by DGFT or Customs Authorities, Which Was Not Established.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Dispute Based on Dishonoured Cheque and Delivery Documents. The court held that the defendants' defence regarding an earlier transaction was not a triable issue and did not warrant leave to defend under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

24 Aug 2012

The plaintiff, Hitesh Lakhamshi Shah, a sole proprietor of M/s. Hitesh Paper Mart, filed a summary suit against the defendants, Pradip Chinubhai Shah ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summons for Judgment in Container Lease Dispute — Defendant Fails to Raise Triable Issues. Plaintiff entitled to decree for unpaid replacement value of lost containers under Equipment Agreement dated 30th December 2002.

23 Aug 2012

The Plaintiff, Florens Containers Inc., filed a summary suit against the Defendant, M/s. Ornate Multimodal Carriers Pvt. Ltd., for recovery of US$ 58,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Recovery Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC — Defendant's Unconditional Leave to Defend Denied Due to No Triable Issue. The court held that the defendant's defence of defective work was not bona fide and no triable issue was raised, as the defendant failed to provide particulars of defects or evidence of set-off.

21 Jun 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. Good Earth Minerals Private Limited, filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the def...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)