Search Results for "interest pendente lite"

320 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Concerning Applicability of Interest on Delayed Payments Act to Prior Contracts. The appeals arise from a common question of law regarding the retrospective application of the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993.

The appeals before the Supreme Court arose from a common question of law regarding the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Impleadment Order in Specific Performance Suit — Purchaser Pendente Lite Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Binds Transferee to Decree, Making Impleadment Unnecessary.

The petitioner, Sri T.S. Mahadevaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 17.1.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Interest Act, 1978 and Article 226 of Constitution Invoked to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit Involving Lis Pendens Transfer. Transfer of Suit Property During Pendency of Appeal Attracts Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The respondent filed a suit for injunction against Mohd.Osman, which was decreed on 1.4.2006. Mohd.Osman appealed on 15.4.2006. During the pendency of...