Search Results for "insult"

675 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 675 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR Against BSNL Officers in SC/ST Act Case — No Intent to Humiliate or Insult Complainant. Adverse remarks made by superior officers in official capacity do not attract Section 3(1)(ix) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 or Section 167 IPC.

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by officers of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) seeking quashing of FIR No. 98/2017 registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside Police Station, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Mohammed Nazim, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Special Case No.22/2004 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by Dnyaneshwar Maroti Bembde, Ramesh Motiram Chavan, and Pralhad Bapurao Bhale against their conviction and sentence under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Alleged Caste-Based Insult Not in Public View as Incident Occurred Inside House, Not Within Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 27th February 2002 passed by the Joint District Judge and Additional Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Namdeo Dnyanaba Agarkar, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC for Abusive Words Uttered in Heat of Quarrel Against Public Figure — Held That Section 295A Requires Deliberate and Malicious Intent to Insult Religious Beliefs, Not Mere Offensive Remarks

The applicant, Khyyum s/o Khadir Patwari, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing SC/ST Commission Proceedings in Private Property Dispute. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Not in Public View and Lacking Caste Intent Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act, 1989.

The petitioners, V.Varun Kumar, Yasmin, and P.Thamizhselvan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Public View and Intent. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private Cabin Does Not Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The applicant, Santosh Thaware, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Protection of Civil Rights Act Case Due to Lack of Caste-Based Insult Evidence. Conviction under Section 7(1)(d) of Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 and Section 506 of IPC set aside as the alleged insult was not shown to be on account of the complainant's caste.

The appellant, Gopal Sukhdeorao Raut, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Akola in Sessions Trial No. 30/2007 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate and Absence of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Intent to Humiliate Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) by the 1st Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Baramati, fo...