Search Results for "initial detention period"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Public Order Disturbance. Detenu's Preventive Detention as Dangerous Person Set Aside as In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Considered and Bail/Notice Under Section 41-A CrPC Were Ignored.

The petitioner, Atahar Khan Amir Khan, a detenu, challenged the detention order dated 29.08.2022 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Akol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.

The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Activist in UAPA Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and the period of house arrest cannot be excluded from the computation of the 90-day period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, a 69-year-old scholar, writer, and civil rights activist, was arrested on 28/10/2018 in connection with FIR No. 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows State's Appeal Against Quashing of Detention Order. High Court's Interpretation of Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 Regarding Detention Period is Erroneous.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the High Court's order quashing a preventive detention order under the Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Mechanical Reproduction of Police Report Without Independent Satisfaction by District Magistrate.

The petitioner, Anant Manikrao Kachale, an agriculturist from Vaitagwadi, Parbhani, challenged his preventive detention order dated 24-08-2017 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in judicial custody; detaining authority failed to consider less restrictive alternatives under ordinary law, rendering detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Mahesh V. Amesur, cousin of Jeetu Shankarlal Chhapru, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging ...