Supreme Court Grants Bail to Foreign National in Fake Currency and UAP Act Case — Long Incarceration Without Trial Progress Warrants Release. Prolonged detention of over nine years without significant trial progress violates right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution, outweighing the risk of absconding by a foreign national.

In Favour of Accused
  • 787
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sheikh Javed Iqbal @ Ashfaq Ansari @ Javed Ansari, a Nepalese national, was arrested on 23.02.2015 after fake Indian currency notes worth Rs. 26,03,500 were recovered from his possession near the Indo-Nepal border. He was charged under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 16 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act). His bail application was rejected by the trial court on 24.08.2016 and by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench on 03.04.2023. The High Court noted the gravity of the offences and the appellant's foreign nationality, concluding there was a strong probability of him evading trial. The appellant had been in custody for over nine years, and only two prosecution witnesses had been examined. The Supreme Court, considering the prolonged incarceration and the slow progress of the trial, held that the appellant's right to a speedy trial was infringed. It granted bail subject to conditions, including furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5 lakhs with two sureties, surrendering his passport, reporting to the police station monthly, and not leaving the country without court permission. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Prolonged Incarceration - Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Appellant, a foreign national, was in custody for over nine years for offences under Sections 489B, 489C IPC and Section 16 UAP Act - Trial had not progressed significantly with only two witnesses examined - Supreme Court held that continued detention without trial progress violates right to speedy trial and granted bail subject to conditions - Held that long incarceration without trial progress outweighs the risk of absconding (Paras 15-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant, a foreign national in custody for over nine years, should be granted bail under Section 439 CrPC given the gravity of offences and likelihood of trial not concluding soon.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order set aside. Appellant granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5 lakhs with two sureties, surrender of passport, monthly police reporting, and not leaving the country without court permission.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • prolonged incarceration
  • right to speedy trial
  • gravity of offence
  • foreign national absconding risk
  • Section 16 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act
  • 1967
  • Sections 489B and 489C Indian Penal Code
  • 1860
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (SC) (7) 181

Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 5260 of 2024

2024-07-03

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

Mr. M.S. Khan for appellant, Ms. Garima Prasad for respondent

Sheikh Javed Iqbal @ Ashfaq Ansari @ Javed Ansari

State of Uttar Pradesh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against rejection of bail application under Section 439 CrPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought bail from the Supreme Court after High Court rejected his bail application.

Filing Reason

Appellant was in custody for over nine years and trial had not progressed significantly.

Previous Decisions

Trial court rejected bail on 24.08.2016; High Court rejected bail on 03.04.2023.

Issues

Whether the appellant should be granted bail given the gravity of offences under IPC and UAP Act. Whether prolonged incarceration without trial progress justifies bail despite the risk of absconding by a foreign national.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he has been in custody for over nine years and trial is unlikely to conclude soon, warranting bail. Respondent argued that charges are serious and appellant being a foreign national may abscond.

Ratio Decidendi

Prolonged incarceration without trial progress violates the right to speedy trial under Article 21, and the risk of absconding by a foreign national can be mitigated by stringent bail conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

Appellant is in custody for more than nine years now. There is no possibility of the criminal trial being concluded in the near future. Considering the period of custody already undergone by the appellant and the fact that the trial is not likely to be concluded in the near future, we are inclined to grant bail to the appellant.

Procedural History

FIR lodged on 22.02.2015; appellant arrested 23.02.2015; chargesheet filed 19.08.2015; supplementary chargesheet 26.08.2015; trial court rejected bail 24.08.2016; High Court rejected bail 03.04.2023; Supreme Court granted leave and heard appeal on 03.07.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Section 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Sections 489B, 489C
  • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act): Section 16, Section 45(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Land Acquisition Authority and Railway Corporation Against Enhanced Compensation for Acquired Paddy Field. Compensation Rate of Rs.24 per Square Metre Upheld Based on Prior Comparable Award for Similar ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Confiscation of Imported Silver Dollars Under Land Customs Act and Other Laws Holding Seizure and Finding of Offences Unjustified. Verdict Rests on Interpretation of Section 5(3) Land Customs Act, 1924, and Absence of Any Eviden...