Search Results for "income tax recovery"

539 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 539 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Commissioner's Order Under Section 33C(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Recovery Certificate for Backwages Upheld Despite Bank's Claim of Limitation and Set-Off

The petitioner, The Goa Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/03/2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for Concealment of Income in Income Tax Reference. Minimum penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 sustained for suppression of net profit of Rs.9,11,521/-.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from proceedings for the Assessment Year 1987-8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reasonable Belief and Change of Opinion. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Nivi Trading Limited, a private limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2010-11 on 15th September 2010 declari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute — Depreciation Disallowance and Penalty Recoverable Under Contract. Arbitrator's interpretation of lease clauses upheld as plausible; no interference under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Chemicals (I) Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...