Search Results for "incidental commercial activity"

154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court's Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"A Case Examining Limitation and Arbitration in Franchise Disputes."

The Supreme Court ruled on the issue of whether the arbitration petition filed by Arif Azim Co. Ltd. was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Exemption Case and Remands for Fresh Consideration. Assessing Officer Directed to Re-examine Charitable Trust Status of Society Running Newspaper with Advertisement Revenue Under Sections 2(15) and 11 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Supreme Court partially allowed an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (revenue) concerning the charitable trust status and tax exemption eli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Exemption Under Notification No.119/75 for Job Work — Goods Manufactured on Job Work Basis Eligible for Duty Exemption on Job Charges

The Petitioner, M/s Godrej Soap Ltd., filed a Writ Petition challenging an order dated 23.3.1989 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) d...