Search Results for "implied compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "implied compliance"

796 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 796 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.

13 Nov 2024

The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Civil Suits and Jurisdiction of School Tribunal under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. Reference Addresses Implied Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction Over Matters Appealable to Tribunal and Related Questions on Approval of Appointments.

18 Dec 2006

The reference to the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from Second Appeal No. 533 of 2001 concerning an employment dispute between a private s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Entire Rule 15 of MEPS Rules Applies to Probationary Employees Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act — Non-Compliance of Sub-Rules (3) and (5) Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate Termination if Sub-Rule (6) Is Satisfied. The court clarified that only sub-rule (6) of Rule 15 is relevant for termination during probation, and failure to comply with sub-rules (3) and (5) does not automatically invalidate termination if the Management has objectively assessed the employee's performance.

30 May 2023

This judgment arises from a reference made by a learned Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, concerning the interpretati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in PIL Concerning Private Nursing Schools. Court Emphasizes Training Requirement for Nurses and State's Constitutional Duty.

9 Jul 2013

The case involved a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Private Nursing Schools and Colleges Management Association, a registered society of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt for Breach of Undertaking in Civil Suit — Disobedience of Undertaking Not Erased by Subsequent Dismissal of Suit. The Court held that an undertaking given to a court is binding and its willful disobedience constitutes contempt under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, regardless of the outcome of the main suit.

5 Mar 2025

The case arises from a civil suit where the plaintiffs sought to revoke a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) dated 30th April 2004. During the pendency...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Suit — Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Injunction Held Maintainable Despite Non-Compliance with Section 52(1)(j)(ii) Notice Requirements. The Court Remanded the Suit for Fresh Consideration on Merits, Holding That the Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide the Validity of Cover Version Notices Under the Copyright Act, 1957.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, M/s. Mars Recording Private Limited, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

11 Feb 2021

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tender Blacklisting Dispute — Non-Disclosure of Show Cause Notice Not a Violation of Declaration Clause. Court holds that a show cause notice does not amount to blacklisting and that the declaration format only required disclosure of actual blacklisting, not pending proceedings.

1 Apr 2019

The case involves a tender floated by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) for setting up call centres. Caretel Infotech Ltd. participated a...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Cross Appeals Against Temporary Injunction Order in Suit by Co-operative Housing Society. Developer and Land Owner Challenge Order Restraining Construction and Use of FSI in Suit Alleging Breach of Development Obligations.

7 Apr 2016

The dispute arose from a development project known as Dosti Flamingos in Sewri, Mumbai. M/s. Dosti Corporation, a partnership firm, acted as developer...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Upholds CLB's Discretion to Grant Interim Relief Under Section 402 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the CLB has wide powers to pass interim orders to prevent oppression and mismanagement, and such orders are not final determinations of rights.

13 Aug 2013

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, filed an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, against an interim order ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)