Search Results for "housing development"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "housing development"

2266 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2266 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

4 Jul 2012

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MHADA's Land Allotment for Housing Society Redevelopment Under MHADA Act, 1976. Court upholds MHADA's power to allot land and rejects allegations of illegality and lack of locus standi.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two petitions, Writ Petition No. 3 of 2013 filed by Shreeprakash Ramganesh Dube and Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2013...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

7 May 2015

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition Imposing 90% Backward Class Membership in Redevelopment of PWR 219 Scheme Land — Condition Held Unreasonable and Without Legal Basis Under Article 226. The court struck down the condition as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, finding it arbitrary and lacking statutory foundation, thereby allowing redevelopment without membership composition restrictions.

25 Aug 2021

The petitioners, members of Sangam Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged a condition imposed by the Social Justice and Special Assistance Depar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petitions in JVPD Scheme Open Space Dispute — MHADA's Authority to Convert Garden Plots to Residential Use under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Act, 1976 Addressed. Detailed Legal Issues Including Consent Terms and Maintainability of Appeal Not Decided.

19 Jul 2017

This common judgment deals with two writ petitions concerning the protection of open spaces in the Juhu Vile Parle Development Scheme (JVPD Scheme) at...

High Court

High Court Issues Directions in Slum Rehabilitation Writ Petitions; Expresses Grave Concern Over Alleged Fraud. No Final Verdict; Ongoing Investigation into Trafficking of Tenements and Non-Fixation of Transit Rent Under SRA Circular.

20 Jun 2023

The Bombay High Court issued a detailed common order in a batch of writ petitions filed by slum dwellers of the Kolekalyan Slum Rehabilitation Authori...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA NOC for Reconstruction — Neighboring Society Failed to Prove Fraud or Infringement of Rights. NOC under DCR 33(7) for reconstruction of cessed building was valid as FSI of 2.5 did not depend on number of tenements and allegations of bogus tenancies were disputed questions of fact not suitable for writ jurisdiction.

28 Jun 2006

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 226 filed by a neighbouring cooperative housing society and its member challenging a No Objection...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction Under Section 80IB(10) for Housing Project Despite Prior Construction on Same Plot — Conditions of Commencement After 1-10-1998 and Approval After That Date Satisfied for New Building 'E'. The court held that each building can be a separate housing project if approved after the cutoff date, and the assessee is eligible for deduction.

28 Mar 2012

The case involves two appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing deduction under Sectio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Relief in Housing Society's Suit for Conveyance and Challenging Construction Approvals. The Court Was Hearing a Notice of Motion and an Appeal from Order Regarding Alleged Unauthorized Construction and Failure to Execute Conveyance Under MOFA.

7 Sep 2012

The judgment text provided is truncated and does not include the court's analysis or final decision. From the available text, the High Court was heari...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)