Search Results for "financial bid clarification"

147 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 147 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.

The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award in Smart City Project — No Material Irregularity Found in Evaluation Process. The court held that the deviations in the commercial bid were not material and the tender committee's decision was reasonable.

The petitioner, NEC Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the decision of Shivamogga Smart City Limited (respondent No.1) to award a tender to Bhar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award Due to Arbitrariness in Technical Evaluation. Petitioner's Bid Rejected Without Proper Consideration of Clarifications, Court Directs Reconsideration.

The petitioner, Kartikay Exploration and Mining Services Pvt. Ltd., challenged the award of a tender by the National Centre for Antarctic and Ocean Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...