Search Results for "expunge evidence"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of ICAR Scientist Challenging Tenure Curtailment — No Enforceable Right to Complete Fixed Term When Appointment Expressly Reserved Power to Curtail. Reversion Based on Unsatisfactory Performance Not Stigmatic Under Service Law.

The appellant, joined ICAR as a Scientist in 1978 and later became Senior Scientist at CIAE, Bhopal. In 1998, he was appointed as ADG-ARIS for a perio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Compensation to Airman for Vindictive Disciplinary Action Over Trivial Incident at Railway Crossing. The Court held that the officer's conduct was disproportionate and vindictive, and the Union of India must compensate the appellant with liberty to recover from the officer.

The appellant, S.P. Pandey, was an Airman in the Indian Air Force with unblemished service from 1997 to 2011. On 17 May 2010, while returning from dut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cognizance Order in SC/ST Act Case — Holds That Special Court Can Take Cognizance Directly and That High Court's Refusal to Quash Proceedings Was Not Erroneous.

The case involves a special leave petition filed by Ramveer Upadhyay and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...