Search Results for "ex-parte interim suspension"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee Dismissed for Corruption. Non-examination of Complainant in Domestic Enquiry Vitiated the Enquiry, Making Dismissal Disproportionate Under Industrial Law.

The respondent, Ravindra Adhar Gosavi, joined the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) as a driver in 1990 and was later promoted to A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Bar Council of India's Ex-Parte Suspension Order Against Advocate for Violation of Natural Justice. The Court holds that interim suspension from practice is a prejudicial order requiring prior hearing under Section 48A(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a senior advocate with 28 years of practice and a sitting member of the Karnataka State Bar Council, faced a complaint of professional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award in Favour of State Government. Order XXVII Rule 8A CPC Does Not Mandate Unconditional Stay; Court Must Impose Conditions Under Section 36(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case arises from a dispute between PAM Developments Private Ltd. (appellant) and the State of West Bengal (respondent) concerning a tender for roa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Subsistence Allowance Payment. Subsistence Allowance Payable Only During Suspension Period, Not After Dismissal Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Pravi Auto Swing Pvt Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 21-3-2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Power to Direct Defendant to Begin Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 1 CPC. Negative Averments and Admission of Possession Shift Burden to Defendant to Prove Title.

The petitioner, M/s. Metafield Coil Pvt. Ltd., the original defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 204/2001, challenged an order passed by the trial cour...