Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.
6 Feb 2026The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...
Search Results for "encroachment removal"
343 result(s) found
Found 343 result(s)
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Eviction Order Against Ashram in Land Encroachment Case — Proceedings Vitiated for Violation of Natural Justice. City Mamlatdar's Order Under Section 61 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879 Set Aside as Show-Cause Notice Not Served and No Opportunity of Hearing Given.
5 Feb 2026The petitioner, Sant Shri Asharam Ashram through its authorized signatory Rajeshkumar Shadilal Bharti, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...
- 166
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Assault Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 324, 332 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
4 Apr 2019The case involves an appeal against conviction under Sections 143, 147, 324, 332 read with 149 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the appellants formed...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Grampanchayat Member in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — Encroachment Allegation Not Proved. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(J3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act set aside as inquiry report exonerated petitioner and no encroachment was established.
1 Apr 2019The petitioner, Shri Shrikant Shrimant Kadam, was elected as a member of Grampanchayat Khodshi from ward No. 3 in the election held on 04/08/2015 for ...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Dispute, Remands for Fresh Consideration of Cadastral Survey Evidence. The court held that the lower appellate court failed to properly consider the Cadastral Surveyor's report which found encroachment of 1½ gunthas over the plaintiff's share, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
29 Jan 2019The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff, Raghunath Kashinath Chavan, against the judgment and decree passed by the lower appella...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Encroachment Dispute — Interim Injunction Granted to Maintain Status Quo Pending Appointment of Court Commissioner. Court holds that in a suit for removal of encroachment, the court must appoint a Commissioner to ascertain the factual position at site before refusing interim relief, and the pendency of such application cannot be ignored.
18 Dec 2017The petitioner, Bholaprasad Foudar Bharti, filed a civil suit (Regular Civil Suit No.438 of 2017) before the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, K...
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
11 Aug 2016The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Court holds that allegations of criminal trespass and mischief are essentially civil in nature and do not disclose any criminal offence, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.
19 Jan 2016The applicant, Harish Khajanchi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Criminal Complain...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Encroachment Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Encroachment Over Agricultural Land. Removal of Encroachment Ordered Based on Cadastral Survey Evidence Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
2 May 2014The dispute pertained to agricultural lands in village Navgan, Rajuri, Beed district. The respondent/plaintiff, Sarjerao s/o. Rama Yadav, claimed owne...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute Cases Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on encroachment and possession were upheld as not perverse under Section 100 of CPC, 1908.
5 Oct 2012The judgment pertains to two second appeals filed by the same appellant, Pandurang Dharma Gaikwad, against the respondent, Mahamudmuya Ahmadsaheb Pati...
