Search Results for "employer's preference"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Workmen Under Industrial Dispute Act. Held that termination without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and workmen are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

The case involves an appeal filed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and its officer against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retrenched Worker Seeking Absorption as Permanent Employee in University — Land Acquisition for Research Centre Entitles Displaced Person to Preference in Employment Under Section 40 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeth) Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Sumanbai Bhaurao Shinde, a retrenched worker of the respondent Marathwada Agricultural University, filed a writ petition seeking direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Workers Challenging Industrial Court Order Refusing Stay of Union Election. Held that the Industrial Court's order was not perverse and did not suffer from any jurisdictional error, and the writ court's supervisory jurisdiction did not warrant interference.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by 25 workers (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing thei...