Search Results for "dowry allegations"

870 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 870 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

The appellants, Sambhaji Mahadeo Kadam (accused No.1), Mahadeo Khandu Kadam (accused No.2), and Shantabai Mahadeo Kadam (accused No.3), were convicted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Absence of Proximate Cause. Conviction under Sections 498A, 304B, 306 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Cruelty or Abetment to Suicide.

The appellant, Kamlesh Satyaprakash Agarwal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 498A, 304B, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Dowry Death and Cruelty in Dowry Demand Case. Presumption under Section 113B of Evidence Act applied as death occurred within seven years of marriage and dowry demand was proved.

The appellant, Vasant Bhagwat Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 304B, 306, 498A of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Dowry Death and Cruelty - Death Occurred Within Seven Years of Marriage and Demand of Dowry Proved - Presumption Under Section 304-B IPC Applied Despite Acquittal for Murder.

The appellant, John Vasant Khandagale, was convicted by the VII Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 178/1988 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dowry Prohibition Act Proceedings Against Wife and Relatives — Complaint by Husband Lacks Prima Facie Case. Allegations of dowry demand by husband against wife and her relatives found vague and motivated, leading to quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The petitioners, who are the wife (petitioner No.1), her father (petitioner No.2), mother (petitioner No.3), and two relatives (petitioners 4 and 5), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Vague Allegations. FIR and Charge-Sheet Lacked Specific Instances of Dowry Demand or Cruelty Under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who are the husband (petitioner no.1) and his parents (petitioners 2 and 3), filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR N...