Search Results for "distinct commercial commodity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "distinct commercial commodity"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Legality of Penalty Imposed Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Misuse of C-Forms in Cement Industry. Court Examines Whether Penalty is Sustainable When Purchased Goods Are Included in Registration Certificate and Used for Purposes Other Than Manufacturing.

24 Mar 2017

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a sales tax appeal and connected revision petitions concerning the levy of penalty under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

29 May 2026

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

High Court

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

22 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Classification of Non-Ferrous Metal Castings as Ingots Under Entry C-I-29 of Schedule C to Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that aluminum castings manufactured by the respondent are covered by the entry for non-ferrous metal ingots, rejecting the Revenue's contention that they are distinct products.

30 Oct 2015

The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales T...

High Court

Writ Appeals Filed by Tea and Coffee Plantation Companies Against Denial of Input Tax Credit on Cultivation Inputs under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Issue: Whether Cultivation Inputs Eligible for Tax Credit Under Section 10(2) Read with Section 2(6) and 2(19) of the Act.

28 Feb 2014

The appeals arose from reassessment orders passed under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, denying input tax credit to tea and coffee plantation...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

10 May 2019

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Goods Sold — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Quality and Rejection of Goods. The court held that where the defendant raises a triable issue, unconditional leave to defend must be granted, and the plaintiff cannot obtain a decree without trial.

13 Oct 2017

The plaintiff, Shree Pushkar Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd., filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendant, Huntsman (International) India Pvt. ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)