Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

1157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Awards Passed in Hire Purchase Dispute. The Court Examines Objections Relating to Stamp Duty, Admissibility of Documents, and Jurisdiction of the Arbitrator.

The dispute stemmed from a Hire Purchase Agreement dated 24 April 1995 between the petitioners and the respondent for eight Honda Accord cars, accompa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Time-Barred Counterclaim in Arbitration. Limitation for Counterclaim Runs from Date of Termination of Contract, Not from Subsequent Correspondence.

The appeal arose from an order dated 1 October 2012 passed by a learned Single Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Non-Payment and Failure to Issue Taking Over Certificate. Court holds that disputes regarding interim payment certificates and issuance of TOC are arbitrable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicants, BSI-JDN Joint Venture and others, filed four applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Retirement Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Arbitrator Erred in Rejecting Petitioners' Claims and Imposing Costs Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Background: The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s. Prospective Traders, constituted in 1977 by three family trusts. In 1985, the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Compensation Dispute. Court upholds award holding that alleged oral settlement was not binding on respondent corporation as officers lacked authority.

The petitioners, M/s. Akbarally's and its partners, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Co-operative Housing Society from Appointing Another Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Letters exchanged between developer and society held to constitute a binding contract for redevelopment, and termination letter declared illegal.

The plaintiff, Pittie Antariksh Grl Pvt Ltd, a real estate company, filed a suit seeking declaration that letters dated 30/8/2021 and 23/10/2021 const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...