Search Results for "discretionary power"

2412 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2412 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Witness and File Additional Documents in Eviction Suit. Order under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC is discretionary and cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence after closure of plaintiff's evidence.

The petitioner, Pandharinath L. Bhandari, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 12 July 2018 passed by the Small Causes Court at Bandra, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Writ Petitions in Property Dispute, Upholding Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that disputes regarding title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings and that appointment of receiver is a discretionary remedy to preserve property.

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a piece of land in Mumbai. The original plaintiff, Amedmal Bhatewada (since deceased), filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Environmentalist's Petition Seeking State Award and Livelihood Support — No Fundamental Right to Discretionary Honors. Writ of Mandamus Not Maintainable for Rajyotsava Award Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sri D.A. Chowdappa, an environmentalist from Chikkballapur District, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State’s Appeal, Sets Aside Single Judge’s Order for Retrospective Promotion under G.O.Ms.No.1170. Court holds that relaxation of service rules is discretionary, cannot be claimed as right, and cannot be applied retrospectively after retirement.

The matter arose from a service dispute wherein a Panchayat Assistant, appointed in 1979 and later transferred as Junior Assistant in 1999 under a 10%...